adventures in xp64

December 2nd, 2008

(1) WoW FPS is decent without tweaks - not quite XP32 FPS though; not sure why.
(2) Registry modifications to disable Nagle et al work.
(3) Dual monitors work flawlessly.
(4) 1GB RAM still free running WoW and a VM with 1GB RAM.
(5) 3com card doesn’t have drivers and I have no idea what model it is (finding out involves crawling around with a torchlight).

Verdict: A+++ (Although I’m wondering why XP64 seems to put most of the load on CPU3 and not balance it among the 4 like XP32/Vista)

P.S. OpenVZ setup is making me stab people. Please help.

Uncategorized ,

C&C: Red Alert 3!!!

November 28th, 2008

Hay guy… Even if you don’t like RTS games… Play RA3 for……

If all army girls looked like that, there would be no private sector.

Other useful notes:
- Alliance > All (based on chickzormeter)
- Russians (or whatever) come in close second… getting orders from a chick in leathers that says FOR MOTHER RUSSIA is always A+++
-Kelly Hu did not bare enough cleavage for the chickzormeter to pick up

Uncategorized , , , , , ,

benny & joon

November 21st, 2008

Finally remembered to DL/watch this A+++ old school movie.

Uncategorized

the adventures of biatch0 in modem/router/wifi-land

November 21st, 2008

D-Link 2542B - Modem, 4-port router. Crashed on first night of download tests… 20% into the first file in queue. Punched random babies in face. Possibly the most messy UI and configuration interface I’ve ever seen (this includes the shit UIs that I code sometimes). On the bright side I saved 1 plug point vs my old setup of SDSL modem + 3Com router. EDIT: Forgot to mention that accessing the router web UI felt similar to accessing a poorly coded and very resource intensive website… running on a 386 SX 16MHz. Everything just felt like it was running on something with 30+ load averages.

Linksys AM300 - Modem. Nothing horrible… just impossible to configure. Nothing to do with Linksys though… apparently TIME engineers thought it would be funny to plug in an Aztech DSL605E somewhere on their switch configured to 192.168.1.1. Modem also refuses to allow configuration without DSL link plugged in (which leads to above problem). Stabbed random babies.

SMC Barricade (long model number that nobody bothers to remember) - Modem, 4-port router. A possible challenger to most horrible to configure UI… right after the previously mentioned D-Link. Couldn’t even get this bugger to activate the DSL connection. Dropped random babies from 16th floor lift shaft.

Aztech DSL605E+Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 (DD-WRT) - Standalone Modem, WiFi+4-port router. Most recent setup… and appears to be going to stay. Seems stable after about 12 hours of testing, DD-WRT only gave me problems initially with DHCP (apparently someone else used the router before and decided my box quadbiatch0 would be called subashini-PC). Buffalo AP/router refuses to clock at 250MHz, not an issue though, at least it didn’t hit 10.0 load and cause latency to 192.168.1.1 to reach almost 100ms when I was loading up the router admin page like the D-Link. Obviously stuff like that pisses me off because I hate having high WoW ping.

Moral of the story: Cheap thing no good, good thing no cheap.

Side note: Average of 260ms to WoW server. Average of 43ms latency to the TIME gateway. Anything above 10ms to the first hop outside the internal network is not acceptable IMHO… it’s plain ridiculous. On my pre-NetLynx connection, 43ms would have gotten me half-way to fucking Hong Kong. Verbal Molotov cocktails are incoming to a TIME engineer near you within the next few days if something doesn’t go right.

Uncategorized , , , ,

the adventures of biatch0 in OSland

November 17th, 2008

WinXP32 - Annoyed at 1GB of RAM touching itself while the other 3GB worked like dogs.

Ubuntu - Happy at all 4GB being available… before finding out the ATI HD4870 support is buggy causing video output to flickr during playback. Also would not play WoW nicely in WINE (which made me stab random people).

Vista64 - All 4GB available. Full HD4870 support with stupidly low framerate. Dual monitor spanning removed from Vista due to changes to the core engine resulted in more people being stabbed. Has no switches to disable tcp_ackfrequency and tcp_nodelay resulting in people being hit with blunt objects.

WinXP32 - Happy.

(Looking to try out XP64 though…)

Uncategorized , , ,

new news

November 13th, 2008

WideCap

New leet proxying tool from the people who brought you FreeCap. Difference is WideCap is system wide as opposed to the single app functionality of FreeCap.

buy abilify online
acai
accutane
order aciphex online
acomplia online
price of actonel
actos overnight no rx
cost of aleve
cheap allegra
alli order online shipping
altace coupon
antibiotics online pharmacy
aricept no rx
arimidex online
ashwagandha tablets
price of astelin
atacand no rx
atarax overnight no rx
augmentin discounted
prices avandia
avapro no prescription
avodart
buy bactrim without prescription
benadryl vs
benicar withdrawal
order biaxin online
price of buspar
cardizem overnight
celebrex mg
celadrin
purchase cephalexin
purchase cialis online
price of cipro
cla no rx
order clarinex
claritin coupon
no prescription clomid
clonidine vs
colchicine discounted
coreg overnight no rx
buying coumadin
cozaar pills
creatine
crestor delivery
cost of cymbalta
cytotec tablets
depakote mg
diclofenac vs
cheapest differin
diflucan online pharmacy
buy diovan online
buy doxycycline without a prescription
effexor rx
flagyl
flomax
glucophage discounted
hair loss
hangover
generic hoodia
keppra
lamictal rx
order lamisil online
lasix online pharmacy
levaquin tablets
purchase levitra
lexapro coupon
lipitor rx
purchase lisinopril online
melatonin online pharmacy
metformin
methotrexate
online micardis
cheapest mobic
motrin no rx
msm
neurontin delivery
nexium no prescription
price of nizoral
nolvadex information
omnicef online
discount paxil
discount penis extender
phentermine
phosphatidylserine
price of plan b
plavix coupon
pravachol overnight no rx
prednisone vs
premarin pills
prices prevacid
prometrium discounted
purchase propecia
provera medication
prozac overnight no rx
no prescription reglan
reminyl
rimonabant reviews
online risperdal
rogaine rx
seroquel pills
singulair withdrawl
cost of skelaxin
prices stop smoking
prices strattera
purchase stress relief online
discount synthroid
tetracycline
buy topamax online
toprol
online toradol
tramadol order online shipping
trazodone
no prescription tricor
trileptal
ultracet product
cost of valtrex
viagra withdrawal
online voltaren
vytorin product
weight loss withdrawl
wellbutrin
yohimbe
zantac with no prescription
zetia mg
prices zestoretic
zithromax online
zoloft tablet
buy zovirax without a prescription
order zyban online
price of zyprexa
zyrtec order online shipping
cheapest zyvox

Uncategorized

The monopoly, the internet, and the prices.

September 23rd, 2008

So here we are heading towards the end of 2008 (almost), with the last mile still closed after some muted discussions (I had no doubt that it would stay closed). Today, I have chosen to spew forth much ranting with regards to the pricing for local internet in Malaysia. I’ve chosen to compare TMNet (largest local telco backed by government, also decided that copper throughout Malaysia which was paid for by taxpayers… was theirs) and TIMENet (my current ISP). I’ve left out the wireless providers for now, mainly because 90% of techies who are in their right mind wouldn’t go for wireless unless it was the last resort.

TIMENet pricing vs TMNet pricing

Since there isn’t really a lowest common denominator (384 unlimited vs 384 time limited), I’ve decided to compare TIMENet’s 448kbps SDSL (HomeNet Pro 448/448, RM138/month) to TMNet’s 512kbps ADSL (512/512, RM66/month). 448kbps (RM138) is TIMENet’s highest offering at the home user level as compared to 2Mbps (RM188) for TMNet (their 4Mbps package isn’t widely available at the moment). What’s with the major discrepancy in pricing?

The government (and IT related entities) continuously rant and rave about making Malaysia some kind of regional focal point for the internet… all the while ignoring the steps they could take that could easily inject rocket fuel into the proverbial bum of the lumbering buffalo that is Malaysian internet. Given that opening the last mile (obviously the best choice) would hurt the bottom line of TMNet (and thus the government who owns XX% of TMNet), it’s fairly certain that the last mile wouldn’t be opened any time soon.

What’s the next best thing? IMHO, allowing only an X% deviation from a set price for a set amount of bandwidth. TIME customers pay double what their TMNet counterparts pay for a semi-equivalent connection… and while some time ago, it could be argued that TIME provided much better quality of service, this is definitely not holding true anymore (yes, TIME is almost as bad as using a banana boat in “The Perfect Storm”). Allowing possibly a 20% deviation upwards (and no limit downwards?) would result in a TMNET 512kbps staying at RM66, while forcing TIME to sell their 448kbps connection for a maximum of approximately RM80 (or no minimum!!!???).

While the last mile continues to be closed and conveniently “owned” by TMNet, there is no reason whatsoever for the pricing to fluctuate so much between different ISPs. The government and the MCMC are doing nothing but holding back any smidgen of growth the local internet user population may be capable of… but the truth is, haven’t the government/TMNet already made enough from their “ownership” of the last mile for the last 15 years or so?

Uncategorized , , ,

wts wow account pst

September 22nd, 2008

update

August 7th, 2008

Spammers broke WP again, appending interesting links into my most recent (previously) post while also breaking the image tag in it (possibly they didn’t consider the post opening with an image when they wrote the “exploit”). This would explain why my previous post may have appeared as a bunch of garbled HTML once in awhile during the past few weeks (assuming you even noticed). So, I upgraded WP to 2.6… and it broke a bunch of themes that I like. Which is why I’m using this boring ugly theme.

3rd August; RIP Sarah@Winnowill, you will be dearly missed.

Uncategorized

inc sand gnomes

April 12th, 2008

13th-18th April 2008.

Uncategorized ,